Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, is intended to provide an overview of topics and indicate sources of more extensive and academic information. Many of the general rules of thumb for conducting research apply to Wikipedia, including:
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
These skills can be applied to both Wikipedia, and the broad range of other digital research environments: Wikipedia offers both the strengths—such as high quality information and hyperlinking of resources—and weaknesses—uncertainty of authorship and reliability—of Web 2.0 as well as many of the characteristics of more traditional ...
Research topics have included the reliability of the encyclopedia and various forms of systemic bias; social aspects of the Wikipedia community (including administration, policy, and demographics); the encyclopedia as a dataset for machine learning; and whether Wikipedia trends might predict or influence human behaviour.
On a more generic level, a 2014 study found no correlation between the characteristics of a given Wikipedia page about an academic and the academic's notability as determined by citation counts. The metrics of each Wikipedia page examined included length, number of links to the page from other articles, and number of edits made to the page.
English: Wikipedia and Academic Research: A guide on interacting with the free encyclopaedia. Wikipedians and Academics have common cause but both need to know to understand where each side is coming from in order to achieve a successful collaboration.
A research design typically outlines the theories and models underlying a project; the research question(s) of a project; a strategy for gathering data and information; and a strategy for producing answers from the data. [1] A strong research design yields valid answers to research questions while weak designs yield unreliable, imprecise or ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 4 March 2025. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August ...