Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A research design typically outlines the theories and models underlying a project; the research question(s) of a project; a strategy for gathering data and information; and a strategy for producing answers from the data. [1] A strong research design yields valid answers to research questions while weak designs yield unreliable, imprecise or ...
Wikipedia:Academic resources – collection of useful resources (links to journals, etc.) Wikipedia:Academic studies of Wikipedia – list of studies; Wikipedia:Academic use – considerations for using Wikipedia as a source for academic work (including a mention that some schools object to citing encyclopedias in general and Wikipedia in ...
These skills can be applied to both Wikipedia, and the broad range of other digital research environments: Wikipedia offers both the strengths—such as high quality information and hyperlinking of resources—and weaknesses—uncertainty of authorship and reliability—of Web 2.0 as well as many of the characteristics of more traditional ...
Ex post facto recruitment methods are not considered true experiments, due to the limits of experimental control or randomized control that the experimenter has over the trait. This is because a control group may necessarily be selected from a discrete separate population. This research design is thus considered a quasi-experimental design.
Citations are crucial in Wikipedia writing. In other kinds of academic writing, citations are used mainly to give proper credit for the origin of an idea. In Wikipedia, citations can be used for this purpose, but more often they serve two other purposes: Verifiability. A reader with some level of lay knowledge (e.g., scientific literacy) but ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 4 March 2025. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August ...
A peer-reviewed paper noted the "social stratification in the Wikipedia society" due to the "admins class".The paper suggested that such stratification could be beneficial in some respects but recognized a "clear subsequent shift in power among levels of stratification" due to the "status and power differentials" between administrators and other editors.
These results also yield important knowledge applicable to other open content communities. In addition to driving scholarly knowledge of such systems, this work can also give results that can improve Wikipedia itself. Much valuable research cannot be done without Wikipedia community members who volunteer to participate in studies.