Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It must be "people's names", because the names belong to the people, just like the countries belong to the world in the second half of your sentence. If you say "people names", that makes 'people' an adjective describing the names, which doesn't really read very well.
Not many people appreciate how much people like it when you take an interest in their names. Names are the primary way that people identify themselves, and anything that shows you're trying to get them right, is worth doing. This also applies to street names: it's important to people because it's where they live.
English people names and street names. 0. Usage of quotation marks. 0.
Information about people may also be in the form of appositives. An appositive is a noun (or a phrase) that defines or explains another noun in the sentence by renaming it. An appositive stands immediately after the noun that it defines. Example. Jim Trent, a young pianist, was invited to play at the reception. Ref Part 6 Articles with People's ...
When reading articles like magazines and newspapers, we see a lot of people's names there, but how people are referred to varies. The following are some of the most common ones. First name alone; First name + Last name; Last name alone; Title (Mr/Mrs/Ms etc.) + Last name; Title (Mr/Mrs/Ms etc.) + First name + Last name; And below are some ...
Most people have no idea anymore what the proper rules of the language are. With the media making such an enormous impact in our world, all the cringing improper grammar used in tv, movies & even commercials, only reinforces our grammatically incorrect habits to where most every language rule flies right out the window. Ok, that's a little extreme.
People can be informally called junior even if their names aren't exactly the same, e.g. the 43rd president being called "Bush junior", and even more informally, it can be used to suggest that someone is following in the footsteps of another, e.g. referring to the 41st president as "Reagan junior".
people's names. The form "persons" doesn't exist in normal English. It does exist in some English jargons, but that's an exceptional case and it carries a range of slightly different meanings. Unless all of the people in the group are expected to share the same name, "names" should be plural. Each person normally has one name, so several people ...
There are no obligatory codes of behaviour when meeting The Queen or a member of the Royal Family, but many people wish to observe the traditional forms. These latter include a bow or a curtsy, then . On presentation to The Queen, the correct formal address is 'Your Majesty' and subsequently 'Ma'am,' pronounced with a short 'a,' as in 'jam'.
The main point is that the subject of the verb is name, or if you address multiple people, names. If you are addressing a single person, you can say: What is your name? If you are asking a group of people to give their names, you ask: What are your names? But the conclusion that "your" takes "are" is absurdly and wrongly oversimplified.