enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Words_to_watch

    The advice in this guideline is not limited to the examples provided and should not be applied rigidly. If a word can be replaced by one with less potential for misunderstanding, it should be. [1] Some words have specific technical meanings in some contexts and are acceptable in those contexts, e.g. claim in law.

  3. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of...

    Descriptive titles should be worded neutrally, so as not to suggest a viewpoint for or against a topic, or to confine the content of the article to views on a particular side of an issue (for example, an article titled "Criticisms of X" might be better renamed "Societal views on X"). Neutral titles encourage multiple viewpoints and responsible ...

  4. Wikipedia:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to...

    Writing down existing state-of-the-art practice: Some issues are tackled in a way that has become more or less standardized, or in a way that follows from the features of the MediaWiki software – in order to help editors not yet acquainted with these systems, the preferred modus operandi is noted down on a guidance page.

  5. Persuasive writing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_writing

    Persuasive writing is a form of written arguments designed to convince, motivate, or sway readers toward a specific point of view or opinion on a given topic. This writing style relies on presenting reasoned opinions supported by evidence that substantiates the central thesis. [1] [2] Examples of persuasive writing include criticisms, reviews ...

  6. Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and...

    Whether a policy or guideline is an accurate description of best practice is determined through consensus. On discussion pages and in edit summaries, shortcuts are often used to refer to policies and guidelines; for example, (no original research), (neutral point of view) and (biographies of living persons). Similar shortcuts are also used for ...

  7. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    This includes argument extraction, conclusion generation, [40] [additional citation(s) needed] argument form quality assessment, [49] machine argumentative debate generation or participation, [44] [46] [47] surfacing most relevant previously overlooked viewpoints or arguments, [44] [46] argumentative writing support [42] (including sentence ...

  8. Template:Essay-like - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Essay-like

    Use this cleanup template to indicate that an article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date The month and ...

  9. Wikipedia:Writing better articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better...

    See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch for other examples. Avoid using words and phrases like terrible, rising star, curiously, championed the likes of or on the other side of the pond, unless part of a quotation or stated as an external viewpoint. Punctuation marks that appear in the article should be used only per generally accepted ...