Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The vice presidential debate between Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota and Sen. JD Vance of Ohio was a civil and policy-oriented affair, and it included some important developments. 36 key lines to ...
[67] At the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Oprah Winfrey used the phrase, [68] and In Taylor Swift's endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris shortly after the second presidential debate. Swift signed off on the post by calling herself one. [69] "They're eating the dogs", a false claim used by Donald Trump in the Second presidential ...
Rhetorical criticism – analysis of the symbolic artifacts of discourse—the words, phrases, images, gestures, performances, texts, films, etc. that people use to communicate; there are many different forms of rhetorical criticism. Rhetorical question – a question asked to make a point instead of to elicit a direct answer.
In competitive debate, most commonly in the World Schools, Karl Popper, and British Parliamentary debate styles, a point of information (POI) is when a member of the team opposing that of the current speaker gets to briefly interrupt the current speaker, offering a POI in the form of a question or a statement. This may be as a correction ...
Presidential debate: See reactions, facial expressions of candidates Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump greet before their first presidential debate in Philadelphia on ...
Networks showed a split screen with both candidates for most of the debate. At various points she looked amused or befuddled by whatever Trump was saying, as if w ordlessly saying he was lying.
In policy debate, fiating the plan is almost always granted without argument, to help debaters and judges evaluate the merits of a plan as though the plan happens. From there, debate ensues, and it is valid to argue that the Affirmative plan is more expensive in dollars than the Negative counterplan, for example, where fiat is granted to both ...
No one wants to read a monolithic, 500-word block of text. And a list of a dozen issues that aren't closely related won't produce a useful discussion. An immature and transparent debate technique is to pick a trivial quibble out of a substantive post, and reply with an objection about that irrelevancy while evading everything of substance.