Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Dr. Helen Fielding – The doctor/vet at the RSPCB, who is kind to Ulf, Tiana, and the legendary beasts. Druce – A mischievous gargoyle who lives with Ulf. Professor Farraway – The founder of the RSPCB. He died many years ago and is now a ghost. Baron Marackai – A beast hunter and the main antagonist. He is the RSPCB's archenemy.
One is the "Consent to Search" law which requires an officer to inform someone they have the right to deny a search and to make sure that person understands that right. The other is the "NYPD ID" law, which requires the officer, in certain situations, to hand out business cards with their name, rank, badge number and command.
The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a charitable organisation registered in England and Wales [1] and in Scotland. [2] It was founded in 1889. It works to promote conservation and protection of birds and the wider environment through public awareness campaigns, petitions and through the operation of nature reserves throughout the United Kingdom.
The Search History feature is available only when you are signed in, and AOL Search will display Search History only for searches done while signed in. View Search History You can view your Search History by clicking on the History drop-down arrow at the upper-right corner of the page.
Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990) - search valid if police reasonably believe consent given by owner; Florida v. Bostick (1991) - not "free to leave" but "free to decline" on bus; Florida v. Jimeno (1991) - can request officer to limit scope of search; Ohio v. Robinette (1996) - do not have to inform motorist is free to go; United States v.
After the traveler declined to provide consent for a search, the DEA Task Force Officer detained the traveler's carry-on bag. Then a drug detection dog alerted to the bag. The passenger eventually ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled that in a case involving a consent search, although knowledge of a right to refuse consent is a factor in determining whether a grant of consent to a search was voluntary, the state does not need to prove that the person who granted consent to search knew of the right to refuse consent under the Fourth ...