Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
After the Supreme Court decision, the SBA List challenged the constitutionality of the Ohio law in federal court in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Susan B. Anthony List v. Ohio Elections Commission. On September 11, 2014, Judge Timothy Black struck down the law as unconstitutional. [25]
The leaders of the SBA List say that Anthony was "passionately pro-life". [24] [25] The portrayal of Susan B. Anthony as a passionate opponent of abortion has been subject to a modern-day dispute. The National Susan B. Anthony Museum and House said, "The List's assertions about Susan B. Anthony's position on abortion are historically inaccurate."
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
The election was the fourth and final time in the 20th century in which either party won the House majority without winning the popular vote, with the previous three instances occurring in 1914, 1942, and 1952. [5] [6] In terms of the total vote, the 1996 result remains one of the closest in U.S. history. This remains the last election in which ...
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy , 342 U.S. 580 (1952), was a United States Supreme Court case which determined that the Alien Registration Act of 1940 's authorization of deportation of legal resident for membership in Communist parties, even past, did not violate the First Amendment , the Fifth Amendment , nor the constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause.
Harris v. Quinn , 573 U.S. 616 (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois state law that allowed a union security agreement .
In her opinion, Justice O'Connor explained the slightly different reasons why she also supports Justice Blackmun's holding. [3] Justice Brennan, joined by Justices Stevens and Marshall, joined parts III-A, IV, and V of Blackmun's opinion. However, Brennan disagreed with Blackmun and O'Connor's respective opinions by stating that the menorah and ...
United States v. Congress of Industrial Organizations, 335 U.S. 106 (1948), is a US labor law decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that a labor union's publication of a statement that advocated for its members to vote for a certain candidate for Congress did not violate the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, as amended by the 1947 Labor Management Relations Act.