enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Case or Controversy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause

    The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the Case or Controversy Clause of Article III of the United States Constitution (found in Art. III, Section 2, Clause 1) as embodying two distinct limitations on exercise of judicial review: a bar on the issuance of advisory opinions, and a requirement that parties must have standing.

  3. Collusive lawsuit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusive_lawsuit

    For example, if two people think a law is unconstitutional, one might sue another in order to put the lawsuit before a court which can rule on its constitutionality. . Because courts generally reserve jurisdiction for situations in which there is an actual case or controversy – i.e., a real dispute between the parties – where such a suit is suspected, the court may refuse to exercise juris

  4. Article Three of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the...

    Section 2 of Article Three delineates federal judicial power. The Case or Controversy Clause restricts the judiciary's power to actual cases and controversies, meaning that federal judicial power does not extend to cases which are hypothetical, or which are proscribed due to standing, mootness, or ripeness issues. Section 2 states that the ...

  5. Supreme Court declines to intervene in challenge to ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-declines...

    “There is no case or controversy here. Petitioner’s members have not suffered any actual harm and the remote possibility that they might suffer harm in the future is far too dependent upon a ...

  6. Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbott_Laboratories_v._Gardner

    Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court.The Court held that drug companies were not prohibited by the ripeness doctrine from challenging a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation requiring a prescription drug's generic name to appear on all related printed materials.

  7. Supreme Court tumbles in public opinion: Can it sink lower ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-tumbles-public-opinion...

    To advance a case, plaintiffs must show they are harmed by the defendant’s actions. More, the injury must be “actual or imminent,” not “conjectural” or “hypothetical,” as the court ...

  8. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins

    Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]

  9. Professors sued Idaho over abortion discussions in class ...

    www.aol.com/idaho-professors-sued-over-abortion...

    Without a live case or controversy to adjudicate, the Court must stay in its lane.” Professors sued Idaho over abortion discussions in class. Here’s what a judge just ruled