Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Set-builder notation can be used to describe a set that is defined by a predicate, that is, a logical formula that evaluates to true for an element of the set, and false otherwise. [2] In this form, set-builder notation has three parts: a variable, a colon or vertical bar separator, and a predicate. Thus there is a variable on the left of the ...
In set-builder notation, it is used as a separator meaning "such that"; see { | }. 3. Restriction of a function : if f is a function , and S is a subset of its domain , then f | S {\displaystyle f|_{S}} is the function with S as a domain that equals f on S .
Here, the list [0..] represents , x^2>3 represents the predicate, and 2*x represents the output expression.. List comprehensions give results in a defined order (unlike the members of sets); and list comprehensions may generate the members of a list in order, rather than produce the entirety of the list thus allowing, for example, the previous Haskell definition of the members of an infinite list.
Set-builder notation makes use of predicates to define sets. In autoepistemic logic , which rejects the law of excluded middle, predicates may be true, false, or simply unknown . In particular, a given collection of facts may be insufficient to determine the truth or falsehood of a predicate.
A set of polygons in an Euler diagram This set equals the one depicted above since both have the very same elements.. In mathematics, a set is a collection of different [1] things; [2] [3] [4] these things are called elements or members of the set and are typically mathematical objects of any kind: numbers, symbols, points in space, lines, other geometrical shapes, variables, or even other ...
Set theory begins with a fundamental binary relation between an object o and a set A. If o is a member (or element) of A, the notation o ∈ A is used. A set is described by listing elements separated by commas, or by a characterizing property of its elements, within braces { }. [8]
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".
The reason is as follows: The intersection of the collection is defined as the set (see set-builder notation) = {:,}. If M {\displaystyle M} is empty, there are no sets A {\displaystyle A} in M , {\displaystyle M,} so the question becomes "which x {\displaystyle x} 's satisfy the stated condition?"