enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. LoopNet - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoopNet

    LoopNet acquired BizBuySell (2004), [6] CityFeet (2007), [7] REApps (2008), [8] Land & Farm/Lands of America (2008) and Bizquest (2010). [9] In April 2012, CoStar Group acquired LoopNet for approximately $860 million in cash and stock. [10] In 2014, the company settled a trademark infringement lawsuit that it brought against Dotloop. [11]

  3. Smith v Croft (No 2) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v_Croft_(No_2)

    Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch 114 is a UK company law case concerning derivative claims. Its principle that in allowing a derivative claim to continue the court will have regard to the majority of the minority's views has been codified in Companies Act 2006 , section 263(4).

  4. Smith v. Spizzirri - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Spizzirri

    Smith v. Spizzirri, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, when a court finds that a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute and a party has requested a stay of the court proceeding pending arbitration, Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act compels the court to issue a stay, and the court lacks discretion to dismiss the suit.

  5. Smith v. Van Gorkom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Van_Gorkom

    Smith v. Van Gorkom 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) [1] is a United States corporate law case of the Delaware Supreme Court, discussing a director's duty of care.

  6. Smith v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Arizona

    Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (2024), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States case in which the court held that when an expert conveys an absent analyst's statements in support of the expert's opinion, and the statements provide that support only if true, then the statements come into evidence for their truth.

  7. Smith v Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v_Smith

    Smith v Smith [1] is an important case in South African law, in particular in the area of civil procedure. It was heard and decided in the Witwatersrand Local Division by Millin J on 22 January 1947. An action for judgment on motion under Rule of Court 42, the case concerned the service of summons at the defendant's place of business, and ...

  8. Herbert Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Smith

    The firm was founded in the City of London in 1882 by Norman Herbert Smith and merged with the Australian law firm Freehills on 1 October 2012, forming Herbert Smith Freehills. [2] At the time of the merger it had 13 offices across Europe , the Middle East and Asia , [ 3 ] around 240 partners and 1,300 fee-earners.

  9. Alvarez v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_v._Smith

    Alvarez v. Smith , 558 U.S. 87 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision on seizure of property by the Chicago Police Department , however the case was declared moot by the Court as the parties agreed that there was no longer contention over the property seized.