Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying immigration and naturalization law. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level.
Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on the Court at the time the decision was handed down are assumed to have participated and concurred unless otherwise noted.
The ruling was issued in a “sham marriage” case after an American citizen applied with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to obtain a visa for her noncitizen Palestinian ...
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices frequently join multiple opinions in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett's first opinion shields the EPA from being forced to release draft opinions on new rules. In FOIA and immigration rulings, Supreme Court gives government the benefit of ...
The nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are often left out of regular partisan sniping, but they're absolutely crucial to determining policy in America. Three cases were consolidated and ...
The statutory review schemes set out in the Securities Exchange Act and Federal Trade Commission Act do not displace a district court’s federal question jurisdiction over claims challenging as unconstitutional the structure or existence of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). New York v. New ...
Texas' controversial immigration law is on hold again after court moves that confounded the Biden administration and spurred outrage from Mexico's government.