Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Further to his entrepreneurial activity, Roberto Ascione is a globally acknowledged thought leader in the field of Digital Health. He is often invited as a guest speaker at top international conferences of his field of activity, as Lions Health, [14] Health 2.0, [15] Doctors 2.0 & You, [16] Health Tech Summit, [17] Healthcare Businesswomen Association Summit, [18] Frontiers of Interaction.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Clarke v Hurst NO and Others [1] is an important case in South African law, with significant ramifications for the legal status of euthanasia.It was heard and decided by Thirion J in the Durban and Coast Local Division on July 30, 1992, and is distinguished from S v Hartmann not only in that it was a civil rather than a criminal matter, but also by the court's divergent finding.
Aniello Ascione (fl 1680 –1708), Italian painter of still lifes; Joe Ascione (1961–2016), American jazz drummer; Patrick Ascione (1953-2014), French composer of electroacoustic and acousmatic music; Roberto Ascione (born 1973), Italian entrepreneur and global thought leader; Thierry Ascione (born 1981), retired French tour male tennis player
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 57 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 2 pages) This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons . Information from its description page there is shown below.
Systems of Survival: A Dialogue on the Moral Foundations of Commerce and Politics is a 1992 book written by American urban activist Jane Jacobs. [1] [2] It describes two fundamental and distinct ethical systems, or "syndromes" as she calls them: that of the Guardian and that of Commerce. She argues that these supply direction for the conduct of ...
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992), was a landmark Supreme Court of the United States decision, handed down on June 12, 1992, that heightened standing requirements under Article III of the United States Constitution. It is "one of the most influential cases in modern environmental standing jurisprudence."