Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In computing, a roundoff error, [1] also called rounding error, [2] is the difference between the result produced by a given algorithm using exact arithmetic and the result produced by the same algorithm using finite-precision, rounded arithmetic. [3]
A decimal data type could be implemented as either a floating-point number or as a fixed-point number. In the fixed-point case, the denominator would be set to a fixed power of ten. In the floating-point case, a variable exponent would represent the power of ten to which the mantissa of the number is multiplied.
⎕CR 'PrimeNumbers' ⍝ Show APL user-function PrimeNumbers Primes ← PrimeNumbers N ⍝ Function takes one right arg N (e.g., show prime numbers for 1 ... int N) Primes ← (2 =+ ⌿ 0 = (⍳ N) ∘. |⍳ N) / ⍳ N ⍝ The Ken Iverson one-liner PrimeNumbers 100 ⍝ Show all prime numbers from 1 to 100 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 ...
One may also round half away from zero (or round half toward infinity), a tie-breaking rule that is commonly taught and used, namely: If the fractional part of x is exactly 0.5, then y = x + 0.5 if x is positive, and y = x − 0.5 if x is negative.
Integer overflow can be demonstrated through an odometer overflowing, a mechanical version of the phenomenon. All digits are set to the maximum 9 and the next increment of the white digit causes a cascade of carry-over additions setting all digits to 0, but there is no higher digit (1,000,000s digit) to change to a 1, so the counter resets to zero.
To initialize an empty array a to a randomly shuffled copy of source whose length is not known: while source.moreDataAvailable j ← random integer such that 0 ≤ j ≤ a.length if j = a.length a.append(source.next) else a.append(a[j]) a[j] ← source.next
For tie-breaking, Python 3 uses round to even: round(1.5) and round(2.5) both produce 2. [124] Versions before 3 used round-away-from-zero: round(0.5) is 1.0, round(-0.5) is −1.0. [125] Python allows Boolean expressions with multiple equality relations in a manner that is consistent with general use in mathematics.
The correct number of sections for a fence is n − 1 if the fence is a free-standing line segment bounded by a post at each of its ends (e.g., a fence between two passageway gaps), n if the fence forms one complete, free-standing loop (e.g., enclosure accessible by surmounting, such as a boxing ring), or n + 1 if posts do not occur at the ends ...