enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Devenpeck v. Alford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devenpeck_v._Alford

    Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court decision dealing with warrantless arrests and the Fourth Amendment.The Court ruled that even if an officer wrongly arrests a suspect for one crime, the arrest may still be "reasonable" if there is objectively probable cause to believe that the suspect is involved in a different crime.

  3. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    Neither is Illinois, since the Illinois Second District Appellate Court Decision in People v. Fernandez, 2011 IL App (2d) 100473, which specifically states that section 107-14 is found in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963, not the Criminal Code of 1961, and governs only the conduct of police officers. There is no corresponding duty in the ...

  4. Brown v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Illinois

    On May 13, 1968, Richard Brown was arrested outside his Chicago, IL. apartment by two members of the Chicago Police. [1] The two officers, William Nolan and William Lenz, entered Mr. Brown's apartment without probable cause later testifying that they had entered to question Brown concerning the death of Roger Corpus, who had been killed a week prior.

  5. Illinois Supreme Court finds no-cash bail constitutional ...

    www.aol.com/illinois-supreme-court-finds-no...

    The Illinois Supreme Court found a major criminal justice reform bill was indeed constitutional on Tuesday, which will see the state end cash bail in the next 60 days.

  6. Probable cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause

    In United States criminal law, probable cause is the legal standard by which police authorities have reason to obtain a warrant for the arrest of a suspected criminal and for a court's issuing of a search warrant. [1] One definition of the standard derives from the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Beck v.

  7. Ybarra v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ybarra_v._Illinois

    Case history; Prior: 58 Ill. App. 3d 57, 373 N. E. 2d 1013: Holding; When a search warrant specifies the person or people named in the warrant to be searched and the things to be seized, there is no authority to search others not named in the warrant, unless the warrant specifically mentions that the unnamed parties are involved in criminal activity or exigent circumstances are clearly shown.

  8. Illinois v. Gates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Gates

    Case history; Prior: 85 Ill. 2d 376, 423 N.E.2d 887; cert. granted, 454 U.S. 1140 (1982).: Holding; The rigid "two-pronged test" under Aguilar and Spinelli for determining whether an informant's tip establishes probable cause for issuance of a warrant is abandoned, and the "totality of the circumstances" approach that traditionally has informed probable cause determinations is substituted in ...

  9. Illinois Supreme Court rules smell of marijuana enough for ...

    www.aol.com/illinois-supreme-court-rules-smell...

    (The Center Square) – Even though marijuana is legal in Illinois, the state’s highest court has ruled that the smell of raw cannabis is enough for police to search a vehicle. The case stems ...