Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The tobacco companies were successful against these lawsuits. Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. [5] As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
Kaplan, Inc.#Class-action lawsuit; Keele Valley Landfill#Resident class action lawsuit; Kemper Corporation#Class-action lawsuit; Kids for cash scandal#Victim lawsuits; Kweku Hanson#Class action lawsuit against Ocwen Federal FSB; Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water#Class-action lawsuit; Long-term effects of benzodiazepines# ...
The various lawsuits were rolled into one class-action lawsuit, and in 2011, Kellogg settled for $5 million — $2.5 million would be paid to consumers, and $2.5 million worth of Kellogg’s ...
Recently, there has been mixed success for plaintiffs in tobacco litigation. In Florida, a large class action lawsuit was rejected, because the court argued that each individual case must be proven. [25] As a result, thousands of individual lawsuits were filed against tobacco companies, but many of these verdicts are now in appeal. [26]
A Florida jury awarded a smoker's widow one of the largest ever legal wins against a tobacco company - a whopping $23.6 billion in punitive damages. Cynthia Robinson sued the R. J. Reynolds ...
The Philippine Tobacco Institute is a trade association composed of leading tobacco companies in the Philippines. [2] Collectively, its members form "the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia". [7] Some of its members over the years have included: Fortune Tobacco Corporation; La Suerte Cigar and Cigarette Factory; Sterling Tobacco Company
A source close to the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against TikTok and the other social media firms told Fortune that the tobacco litigation is an apt parallel to the current situation. In particular ...
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. [1] was a case in which the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held several major tobacco companies liable for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act [2] by engaging in numerous acts of fraud to further a conspiracy to deceive the American public about nicotine addiction and the health effects ...