enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of programming languages by type system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    This is a comparison of the features of the type systems and type checking of multiple programming languages.. Brief definitions A nominal type system means that the language decides whether types are compatible and/or equivalent based on explicit declarations and names.

  3. Case sensitivity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_sensitivity

    Some other programming languages have varying case sensitivity; in PHP, for example, variable names are case-sensitive but function names are not case-sensitive. This means that if a function is defined in lowercase, it can be called in uppercase, but if a variable is defined in lowercase, it cannot be referred to in uppercase.

  4. Comparison of programming languages (syntax) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Off-side rule languages: Boo, Cobra, CoffeeScript, F#, Haskell (in do-notation when braces are omitted), LiveScript, occam, Python, Nemerle (Optional; the user may use white-space sensitive syntax instead of the curly-brace syntax if they so desire), Nim, Scala (Optional, as in Nemerle)

  5. Naming convention (programming) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naming_convention...

    In computer programming, a naming convention is a set of rules for choosing the character sequence to be used for identifiers which denote variables, types, functions, and other entities in source code and documentation.

  6. Strong and weak typing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_and_weak_typing

    For example, Aahz Maruch observes that "Coercion occurs when you have a statically typed language and you use the syntactic features of the language to force the usage of one type as if it were a different type (consider the common use of void* in C). Coercion is usually a symptom of weak typing.

  7. Comparison of Pascal and C - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Pascal_and_C

    The Extended Pascal standard extends Pascal to support many things C supports, which the original standard Pascal did not, in a type safer manner. For example, schema types support (besides other uses) variable-length arrays while keeping the type-safety of mandatory carrying the array dimension with the array, allowing automatic run-time ...

  8. Case preservation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_preservation

    A system that is non-case-preserving is necessarily also case-insensitive. This applies, for example, to Identifiers (column and table names) in some relational databases (for example DB2, Interbase/Firebird, Oracle and Snowflake [1]), unless the identifier is specified within double quotation marks (in which case the identifier becomes case-sensitive).

  9. P-code machine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-code_machine

    One of the most notable uses of P-Code machines is the P-Machine of the Pascal-P system. The developers of the UCSD Pascal implementation within this system construed the P in P-code to mean pseudo more often than portable; they adopted a unique label for pseudo-code meaning instructions for a pseudo-machine.