Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: Application of Gault; 99 Ariz. 181 (1965), Supreme Court of Arizona, Rehearing denied Holding; Juveniles tried for crimes in delinquency proceedings should have the right of due process protected by the Fifth Amendment, including the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.
Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County: Racial Segregation: 377 U.S. 218 (1964) closing the local school and giving white students vouchers to attend schools outside of the county was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther: 377 U.S. 422 (1964)
Davenport first took the bar exam about a year after finishing law school but only passed on the fifth time. She was admitted to practice law in 1995, nine years after getting her law degree. Davenport created a "process" different from federal or local norms that asks law enforcement to arrest, transport to the detention center for screening ...
Board of Education, Island Trees School District v. Pico: 457 U.S. 853 (1982) Right to remove "objectionable" books from school libraries Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. 458 U.S. 50 (1982) Article III of the U.S. Constitution and the Bankruptcy Code: Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. 458 U.S. 419 (1982) Per se rule of ...
Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), [2] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders. [3] [4] The ruling applied even to those persons who had committed murder as a juvenile, extending beyond Graham v.
Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972), was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The court ruled that students with disabilities must be given a public education even if the students are unable to pay for the cost of the education ...
A Star-Telegram investigation finds Tarrant County Judge Alex Kim’s unorthodox methods — akin to courtroom reality TV —exposed children to the darkest elements of online trolling and racism.
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that: certain public-sector employees can have a property interest in their employment, per Constitutional Due Process. See Board of Regents v. Roth