Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In January 2021, the Elasticsearch project used such rights to move the project to a non-open-source license [6] arguing Amazon had been "misleading and confusing the community". Our license change is aimed at preventing companies from taking our Elasticsearch and Kibana products and providing them directly as a service without collaborating ...
proprietary license On 16 August 2017, the source code of the game engine was made freely available under proprietary license terms via GitHub. [3] [4] Apple DOS: Apple Inc. 1986 2015 No No No non-commercial license The Apple DOS source code was released by the Computer History Museum [5] after Paul Laughton, the creator of the code, donated it ...
An early example of an open-source project that did successfully re-license for license compatibility reasons is the Mozilla project and their Firefox browser. The source code of Netscape's Communicator 4.0 browser was originally released in 1998 under the Netscape Public License/Mozilla Public License [6] but was criticised by the FSF and OSI for being incompatible.
Software licensing agreements usually prohibit resale, enabling the company to maximize revenue. [20] Proprietary software is usually offered under a restrictive license that bans copying and reuse and often limits the purchaser to using the software on one computer. [21] [22] Source code is rarely available.
Proprietary software vendors can prohibit the users from sharing the software with others. Another unique license is required for another party to use the software. In the case of proprietary software with source code available, the vendor may also prohibit customers from distributing their modifications to the source code.
The decision to use open-source software, or even engage with open-source projects to improve existing open-source software, is typically a pragmatic business decision. [ 71 ] [ 72 ] When proprietary software is in direct competition with an open-source alternative, research has found conflicting results on the effect of the competition on the ...
The BSD license is a simple license that merely requires that all code retain the BSD license notice if redistributed in source code format, or reproduce the notice if redistributed in binary format. The BSD license (unlike some other licenses e.g. GPL) does not require that source code be distributed at all.
In this scenario, one option is a proprietary software license, which allows the possibility of creating proprietary applications derived from it, while the other license is a copyleft free software/open-source license, thus requiring any derived work to be released under the same license. The copyright holder of the software then typically ...