Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Arbitration Act 2005 (Malay: Akta Timbang Tara 2005) is a Malaysian law that was enacted to reform the law relating to domestic arbitration, provide for international arbitration, recognize and enforce awards, and deal with related matters.
High-Low Arbitration, or Bracketed Arbitration, is an arbitration wherein the parties to the dispute agree in advance the limits within which the arbitral tribunal must render its award. It is only generally useful where liability is not in dispute, and the only issue between the parties is the amount of compensation.
Civil Aviation Act 1969: 3 In force Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia Act 2017: 788 In force Civil Defence Act 1951: 221 In force Civil Law Act 1956: 67 In force Civil List Act 1982: 269 In force Co-operative College (Incorporation) Act 1968: 437 In force Co-operative Societies Act 1948: 287 Repealed by Act 502 Co-operative Societies Act ...
International arbitration is an alternative to local court procedures. International arbitration has different rules than domestic arbitration, [6] and has its own non-country-specific standards of ethical conduct. [7] The process may be more limited than typical litigation and forms a hybrid between the common law and civil law legal systems. [8]
2nd Parliament of Malaysia (Total: 12) Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1] Ministerial Functions Act 1969 [Act 2] Civil Aviation Act 1969 [Act 3] Employees' Social Security Act 1969 [Act 4] Election Offences Act 1954 [Act 5] Finance Companies Act 1969 [Act 6] ( Repealed by the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 [Act 372] )
In contract law, a forum selection clause (sometimes called a dispute resolution clause, choice of court clause, governing law clause, jurisdiction clause or an arbitration clause, depending on its form) in a contract with a conflict of laws element allows the parties to agree that any disputes relating to that contract will be resolved in a specific forum.
The Malaysia Sulu case is an international legal dispute in which persons claiming to be heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu made claims against the government of Malaysia by way of arbitration. The claims were subsequently litigated in the Spanish, French, and Dutch court systems. [ 1 ]
The parties are generally free to determine their own procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators, including the procedure for the selection of an umpire or chairperson. [4] If the parties decline to specify the mode for selecting the arbitrators, then the relevant legal system will usually provide a default selection process.