Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Neo-Luddism or new Luddism is a philosophy opposing many forms of modern technology. [1] The term Luddite is generally used as a pejorative applied to people showing technophobic leanings. [2]
[42] By 2006, the term neo-Luddism had emerged to describe opposition to many forms of technology. [43] According to a manifesto drawn up by the Second Luddite Congress (April 1996; Barnesville, Ohio ), neo-Luddism is "a leaderless movement of passive resistance to consumerism and the increasingly bizarre and frightening technologies of the ...
Computers, among many other technologies, are feared by technophobes. Technophobia (from Greek τέχνη technē, "art, skill, craft" [1] and φόβος phobos, "fear" [2]), also known as technofear, is the fear or dislike of, or discomfort with, advanced technology or complex devices, especially personal computers, smartphones, and tablet computers. [3]
“OP” and “OPP” can mean a lot of different things ... and your teens might define it differently than you do. ... Then there's also “OPP” (sometimes spelled with one “P,” sometimes ...
Criticism of technology is an analysis of adverse impacts of industrial and digital technologies. It is argued that, in all advanced industrial societies (not necessarily only capitalist ones), technology becomes a means of domination, control, and exploitation, [ 1 ] or more generally something which threatens the survival of humanity.
Within the ecological and health spheres, Levins identifies a conflict "not between science and antiscience, but rather between different pathways for science and technology; between a commodified science-for-profit and a gentle science for humane goals; between the sciences of the smallest parts and the sciences of dynamic wholes...
The digital divide is the unequal access to digital technology, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and the internet. [1] [2] The digital divide worsens inequality around access to information and resources.
In analytic philosophy, anti-realism is the position that the truth of a statement rests on its demonstrability through internal logic mechanisms, such as the context principle or intuitionistic logic, in direct opposition to the realist notion that the truth of a statement rests on its correspondence to an external, independent reality. [1]