Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 did make a system of administrative law judges to hear housing discrimination cases to help against the illegal actions. Other examples of federal legislation may include increased federal legislation enforcement, scattered-site housing, [21] or state and local enforcement on a more concentrated level. [81]
The ruling did not address the right of owners or developers to restrict housing based on private agreements, meaning private housing restrictions against race were legally enforceable. Justice Holmes wrote a draft opinion which suggested the case was "manufactured" by the seller and buyer. He withdrew the dissent and voted with the majority. [5]
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants (deed restrictions) cannot legally be enforced.
Superior Court Judge Curtis Kin determined that SB 9 is unconstitutional because it doesn’t provide housing restricted for low-income residents, which he said was the law's stated purpose. For ...
A growing number of cities and states have reformed zoning laws to increase housing supply. - Ben McCanna/Portland Press Herald/Getty Images. ... Kentucky, was unconstitutional. But in 1926, the ...
The proposition became law after receiving support from 65% of voters. [1] In 1966, the California Supreme Court in a 5–2 split decision declared Proposition 14 unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution (Fourteenth Amendment). [2] The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that decision in 1967 in Reitman v ...
In the United States, housing segregation is the practice of denying African Americans and other minority groups equal access to housing through the process of misinformation, denial of realty and financing services, and racial steering. [1] [2] [3] Housing policy in the United States has influenced housing segregation trends throughout history.
A request by L.A. County to temporarily waive state housing laws drew the ire from advocates who accused the county of skirting efforts aimed at boosting affordable housing.