enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Moral equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_equivalence

    Moral equivalence is a term used in political debate, usually to deny that a moral comparison can be made of two sides in a conflict, or in the actions or tactics of two sides. The term had some currency in polemic debates about the Cold War .

  3. Moral Injury: The Grunts - The ... - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/moral-injury/the-grunts

    In both wars, context made it tricky to deal with moral challenges. What is moral in combat can at once be immoral in peacetime society. Shooting a child-warrior, for instance. In combat, eliminating an armed threat carries a high moral value of protecting your men. Back home, killing a child is grotesquely wrong.

  4. Moral conversion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_conversion

    Moral conversion is a relatively rare event in a person's normal development. It involves a decision that is both conscious and existentialist (i.e. based on critical questioning). [1] Moral conversion is based on the internalist view of morality. [2]

  5. Moral relativism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism

    Meta-ethical moral relativists believe not only that people disagree about moral issues, but that terms such as "good", "bad", "right" and "wrong" do not stand subject to universal truth conditions at all; rather, they are relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of an individual or a group of people. [7]

  6. Moral Injury - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/moral-injury

    Moral injury is a relatively new concept that seems to describe what many feel: a sense that their fundamental understanding of right and wrong has been violated, and the grief, numbness or guilt that often ensues. Here, you will meet combat veterans struggling with the moral and ethical ambiguities of war.

  7. The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moral_Philosopher_and...

    A world of only rocks would have no good or bad. A world with one thinking being in it would have plenty of good and bad—some things would work out as that being wanted them, others wouldn't. It could even have moral conflict of a sort, as that one thinker may have trouble rendering his own ideals consistent with one another.

  8. Moralistic fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy

    Pinker goes on to explain that "[t]he moralistic fallacy is that what is good is found in nature. It lies behind the bad science in nature-documentary voiceovers: lions are mercy-killers of the weak and sick, mice feel no pain when cats eat them, dung beetles recycle dung to benefit the ecosystem and so on.

  9. Is–ought problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is–ought_problem

    This is similar to work done by the moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, who attempts to show that because ethical language developed in the West in the context of a belief in a human telos—an end or goal—our inherited moral language, including terms such as good and bad, have functioned, and function, to evaluate the way in which certain ...