enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: backpack with charger built in case for cell phone protection claim at&t

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Riley v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California

    Diaz (2011) Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. [2][3] The case arose from inconsistent rulings on cell phone searches ...

  3. United States v. AT&T (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)

    Laws applied. Sherman Antitrust Act. United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, [ 1 ] that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, and the breakup of the old AT&T natural monopoly into seven regional Bell operating companies and a much smaller new version of AT&T.

  4. Room 641A - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

    Room 641A is a telecommunication interception facility operated by AT&T for the U.S. National Security Agency, as part of its warrantless surveillance program as authorized by the Patriot Act. The facility commenced operations in 2003 and its purpose was publicly revealed by AT&T technician Mark Klein in 2006. [1] [2]

  5. AT&T to pay $13 million to settle FCC probe over cloud data ...

    www.aol.com/t-pay-13-million-settle-203416798.html

    AT&T has agreed to pay $13 million to settle a federal investigation into whether the mobile phone service provider failed to protect customer information in connection with a data breach last ...

  6. Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._AT&T_Corp.

    35 U.S.C. § 271 (f) Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437 (2007), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court reversed a previous decision by the Federal Circuit and ruled in favor of Microsoft, holding that Microsoft was not liable for infringement on AT&T 's patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (f). [2]

  7. Hepting v. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hepting_v._AT&T

    Hepting v. AT&T, 439 F.Supp.2d 974 (N.D. Cal., 2006), was a class action lawsuit argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) on behalf of customers of the telecommunications company AT&T. The plaintiffs alleged that AT&T permitted and assisted the National ...

  1. Ads

    related to: backpack with charger built in case for cell phone protection claim at&t