Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
conversion, unjust enrichment, restitution, the right to an accounting, human rights violations and violations of international law: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: In re American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Litigation: violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Termination fees are common to service industries such as cellular telephone service, subscription television, and so on, where they are often known as early termination fees. For instance, a customer who purchases cellular phone service might sign a two-year contract, which might stipulate a $ 350 fee if the customer breaks the contract.
AT&T. Total settlement: $60 million. Deadline to file claim: May 18, 2023. ... The settlement includes those who received erroneous overdraft fees in their checking accounts, misapplied payments ...
The reception of unjust enrichment into Belgian law has been upheld multiple times by the Court of Cassation, which has ruled that unjust enrichment is a general principle of law. [27] [28] [29] The Court has stated that the legal basis for unjust enrichment is equity (ius aequum). According to the Court, five elements constitute unjust enrichment:
After a brutal few months battling Obama administration officials on two fronts, AT&T (NYS: T) has given up its blockbuster $39 billion bid to acquire Bellevue, WA-based T-Mobile USA from Deutsche ...
Disgorgement is the act of giving up something on demand or by legal compulsion, for example giving up profits that were obtained illegally. [1]In United States regulatory law, disgorgement is often a civil remedy imposed by some regulatory agencies to seize illegally obtained profits.
The family members of a 102-year-old woman said they were stunned to receive a DirecTV bill including an early termination fee months after the elder died.
An action for money had and received to the plaintiff's use is the name for a common law claim derived from the form of action known as indebitatus assumpsit.The action enabled one person to recover money which has been received by another: for example, where a plaintiff paid money to the defendant while labouring under a mistake of fact or where there was a total failure of consideration.