enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Davis v. United States (2011) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(2011)

    Davis v. United States , 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule ". [ 1 ]

  3. Davis v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States

    Davis v. United States, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), a per curiam opinion; Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule) Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (invocation of the right to counsel under Miranda) Davis v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (charitable deductions under §170 of the Internal Revenue Code ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 384

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 02:33 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  5. Good-faith exception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good-faith_exception

    In Davis v. United States (2011), [16] the Court ruled that evidence gathered from a search performed in reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent that was later overruled as being unconstitutional (here, a vehicle search that was rendered unconstitutional in view of Arizona v. Gant) was admissible under the good-faith exception. [17]

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 328

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc. 328 U.S. 1: 1946: Illinois ex rel. Gordon v. United States: 328 U.S. 8: 1946: El Dorado Oil Works v.

  7. Davis v. United States (1973) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1973)

    Davis v. United States, 411 U.S. 233 (1973), was a 1973 United States Supreme Court case concerning criminal procedure and collateral attacks on criminal convictions. The majority opinion, authored by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist, held that when claims of unconstitutional jury discrimination are brought on postconviction collateral review, they are subject to the timeliness ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com/?icid=aol.com-nav

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Reports/B

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S...

    Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States: 715 Davis v. Massachusetts: 716 Reyes Mata v. Lynch: 717 Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. 718 Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. 719 Fisher v. University of Texas (2013) 720 Simmons v. United States: 721 Trade-Mark Cases: 722 Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp ...