Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Yoram Reuben Hazony (born 1964) [1] is an Israeli-American philosopher, Bible scholar, and political theorist. He is president of the Herzl Institute [2] in Jerusalem and serves as the chairman of the Edmund Burke Foundation. [3] He has argued for national conservatism in his 2018 book The Virtue of Nationalism [4] and 2022's Conservatism: A ...
[1] [2] In particular, Hazony argues that nationalism uniquely provides "the collective right of a free people to rule themselves." [2] According to Hazony, national identity is based not on race or biological homogeneity, but on "bonds of mutual loyalty" to a shared culture and a shared history that bind diverse groups into a national unit. [3]
In place of liberalism, Hazony argues for the centrality of societal hierarchies, loyalty, honor, and the conservation and renewal of traditional institutions such as the traditional family and public religion. [2] Hazony argues that an alternative political paradigm to the liberal one is offered by conservatism, which he summarises in the ...
The Shalem Center was established in 1994 by the young American Jewish scholar Yoram Hazony as a think tank "intended to confront what he saw as the dangers posed by post-Zionism", financed by conservative funders in the USA. Hazony had served as Benjamin Netanyahu's ghost writer and was one of his advisers. [2]
In the United States, postliberalism has been more influential among conservatives critical of the fusionist synthesis of free markets and traditional values that developed in the 1950s such as Patrick Deneen, Rod Dreher, and Adrian Vermeule, as well as the Israeli conservative philosopher Yoram Hazony. [6] [7] [8]
It is also known as the window of discourse. The term is named after the American policy analyst and former senior vice president at Mackinac Center for Public Policy , Joseph Overton , who proposed that the political viability of an idea depends mainly on whether it falls within an acceptability range, rather than on the individual preferences ...
Members of the public sphere must adhere to certain rules for an "ideal speech situation" to occur. They are: 1. Every subject with the competence to speak and act is allowed to take part in a discourse. 2a. Everyone is allowed to question any assertion whatever. 2b. Everyone is allowed to introduce any assertion whatever into the discourse. 2c.
[25] [26] Kir cited public safety as a concern. [27] Two other Brussels-area venues had previously backed out of hosting the conference due to pressure from local mayors. [25] Police barricaded the entrance and allowed participants to leave, but did not let anyone enter; the event partially took place with those already in the building. [25]