enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Template:Academic-written review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Academic-written...

    Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...

  3. Wikipedia : WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    The draft submission template is merely used to keep track of unsubmitted drafts. Once it has been submitted for review, this template should be removed. ArticlesForCreationBot is tasked with removing the draft submission template, so only the pending review template should remain. If a draft submission meets the quick fail criteria, then it is ...

  4. Wikipedia:Content assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment

    The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible.

  5. Template:Grading scheme - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Grading_scheme

    The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure.

  6. Template:Academic-written review/sandbox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Academic-written...

    Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...

  7. Wikipedia:Manual of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style

    A short description, with the {{Short description}} template; A disambiguation hatnote, most of the time with the {} template (see also Wikipedia:Hatnote § Hatnote templates) No-output templates that indicate the article's established date format and English-language variety, if any (e.g., {{Use dmy dates}}, {{Use Canadian English}})

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Wikipedia : Good article nominations/Instructions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article...

    To review an article you must: Be a registered user—make sure you are logged in. Not be the nominator nor have made significant contributions to the article prior to the review—opening your own review is not allowed and will delay the article's review. Remember: Once you start a review, you are committing to complete it in a timely manner.