enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Damages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damages

    Recovery of damages by a plaintiff in lawsuit is subject to the legal principle that damages must be proximately caused by the wrongful conduct of the defendant. This is known as the principle of proximate cause. This principle governs the recovery of all compensatory damages, whether the underlying claim is based on contract, tort, or both. [5]

  3. Negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence

    Negligence (Lat. negligentia) [1] is a failure to exercise appropriate care expected to be exercised in similar circumstances. [2]Within the scope of tort law, negligence pertains to harm caused by the violation of a duty of care through a negligent act or failure to act.

  4. Ultramares Corp. v. Touche - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramares_Corp._v._Touche

    Cardozo, C.J., held that the claim in negligence failed on the ground that the auditors owed the plaintiff no duty of care, there being no sufficiently proximate relationship. [1] The two causes of action will be considered in succession, first the one for negligence and second that for fraud.

  5. Tort - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort

    Comparative negligence is a partial legal defence that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury, which progressively displaced the erstwhile traditional doctrine of contributory negligence over the ...

  6. Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blyth_v_Birmingham...

    In establishing the basis of the case, Baron Alderson, made what has become a famous definition of negligence: Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.

  7. Res ipsa loquitur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_ipsa_loquitur

    Res ipsa loquitur (Latin: "the thing speaks for itself") is a doctrine in common law and Roman-Dutch law jurisdictions under which a court can infer negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved in the context of tort litigation.

  8. English tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_tort_law

    English tort law concerns the compensation for harm to people's rights to health and safety, a clean environment, property, their economic interests, or their reputations. A "tort" is a wrong in civil law, [1] rather than criminal law, that usually requires a payment of money

  9. Acts of the claimant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_the_claimant

    Contributory negligence used to be a complete defence, but the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 allows the court to apportion liability for damages between the claimant and the defendant where the claimant's negligence has materially added to the loss or damage sustained. Section 1 provides: