Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In strategic planning and strategic management, SWOT analysis (also known as the SWOT matrix, TOWS, WOTS, WOTS-UP, and situational analysis) [1] is a decision-making technique that identifies the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an organization or project.
The organization analysis revealed the competences of the organization and also its strengths and weaknesses. These strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats summarize the entire context analysis. A SWOT-i matrix, depicted in the table below, is used to depict these and to help visualize the strategies that are to be devised. SWOT- i ...
A SWOT analysis looks at both current and future situations. The goal is to build on strengths as much as possible while reducing weaknesses. This analysis helps a company come up with a plan that keeps it prepared for a number of potential scenarios, as part of corporate planning or strategic planning
SWOT analysis, which addresses internal strengths and weaknesses relative to the external opportunities and threats; Growth-share matrix, which involves portfolio decisions about which businesses to retain or divest; and; Balanced scorecards and strategy maps, which creates a systematic framework for measuring and controlling strategy.
Third, this proactive knowledge will give the firms strategic agility. Offensive strategy can be implemented more quickly in order to exploit opportunities and capitalize on strengths. Similarly, defensive strategy can be employed more deftly in order to counter the threat of rival firms from exploiting the firm's own weaknesses. [4]
Internal environment, regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the organization's resources (i.e., its people, processes and IT systems). [15] Strategic decisions are based on insight from the environmental assessment and are responses to strategic questions about how the organization will compete, such as: What is the organization's business?
Clifton and his team developed the test using Gallup's historical polling data, interviews with leaders and work teams, and consultations. They identified four primary strength domains: executing, influencing, relationship building, and strategic thinking. Within those domains, they identified 34 strength areas: [3]
Current curriculum strengths and weaknesses and the process used to determine these strengths and weaknesses; How curriculum strategies are aligned to state standards; Current procedures for using technology to address any perceived curriculum weaknesses; How teachers integrate technology into their lessons; How students use technology [2] [3]