Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In many strict languages, some advantages of non-strict functions can be obtained through the use of macros or thunks. Strict programming languages are often associated with eager evaluation, and non-strict languages with lazy evaluation, but other evaluation strategies are possible in each case. [citation needed] The terms "eager programming ...
mixed mode: PHP + HTML + JavaScript + CSS, single-mode: PHP, Javascript, CSS, XML; extensible Hundreds of languages Syntax checking HTML, CSS, JavaScript (using JSHint) Some No JavaScript (using JSLint) No No HTML, JavaScript (using JSLint) HTML, CSS, JavaScript, TypeScript Tab support Yes Yes Yes Yes Some Yes Yes Yes Indent, new line keeps level
For example, Aahz Maruch observes that "Coercion occurs when you have a statically typed language and you use the syntactic features of the language to force the usage of one type as if it were a different type (consider the common use of void* in C). Coercion is usually a symptom of weak typing.
One prominent difference between quirks and no-quirks modes is the handling of the CSS Internet Explorer box model bug.Before version 6, Internet Explorer used an algorithm for determining the width of an element's box which conflicted with the algorithm detailed in the CSS specification, and due to Internet Explorer's popularity many pages were created which relied upon this non-standard ...
In programming language theory, lazy evaluation, or call-by-need, [1] is an evaluation strategy which delays the evaluation of an expression until its value is needed (non-strict evaluation) and which avoids repeated evaluations (by the use of sharing). [2] [3] The benefits of lazy evaluation include:
A non-strict evaluation order is an evaluation order that is not strict, that is, a function may return a result before all of its arguments are fully evaluated. [ 28 ] : 46–47 The prototypical example is normal order evaluation , which does not evaluate any of the arguments until they are needed in the body of the function. [ 29 ]
In computer science, type safety and type soundness are the extent to which a programming language discourages or prevents type errors.Type safety is sometimes alternatively considered to be a property of facilities of a computer language; that is, some facilities are type-safe and their usage will not result in type errors, while other facilities in the same language may be type-unsafe and a ...
JavaScript-based web application frameworks, such as React and Vue, provide extensive capabilities but come with associated trade-offs. These frameworks often extend or enhance features available through native web technologies, such as routing, component-based development, and state management.