enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of solid-fuelled orbital launch systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_solid...

    Vehicle Main stages Origin Manufacturer Height (meter) Diameter (meter) Weight (ton) Mass to... (kg) Maiden flight Retired Record Status Solid

  3. Comparison of orbital launch systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_orbital...

    This comparison of orbital launch systems lists the attributes of all current and future individual rocket configurations designed to reach orbit. A first list contains rockets that are operational or have attempted an orbital flight attempt as of 2024; a second list includes all upcoming rockets.

  4. Comparison of orbital rocket engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_orbital...

    Engine Origin Designer Vehicle Status Use Propellant Power cycle Specific impulse (s) [a] Thrust (N) [a] Chamber pressure (bar) Mass (kg) Thrust: weight ratio [b] Oxidiser: fuel ratio

  5. Comparison of crewed space vehicles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_crewed_space...

    Spacecraft Origin Manufacturer Range Launch system Crew size Length (m) Diameter (m) Launch mass (kg) Power system Recovery method Payload (kg) ‡

  6. Space vehicle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_vehicle

    The earliest space vehicles were expendable launch systems, using a single or multistage rocket to carry a relatively small spacecraft in proportion to the total vehicle size and mass. [1] An early exception to this, the Space Shuttle , consisted of a reusable orbital vehicle carrying crew and payload, supported by an expendable external ...

  7. Comparison of space station cargo vehicles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_space...

    Rocket Factory Augsburg: 3,400 <13 ≥1,000 [25] ... Comparison of orbital rocket engines; References This page was last edited on 9 November 2024, at 01:38 ...

  8. SpaceX Starship - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship

    When stacked and fully fueled, Starship has a mass of approximately 5,000 t (11,000,000 lb), [c] a diameter of 9 m (30 ft) [17] and a height of 121.3 m (398 ft). [6] The rocket has been designed with the goal of being fully reusable to reduce launch costs; [18] it consists of the Super Heavy booster and the Starship upper stage [19] which are powered by Raptor and Raptor Vacuum engines.

  9. Shuttle-derived vehicle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle-Derived_Vehicle

    A payload or second stage would have fit atop the core stage, and two detachable Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters would have been mounted on the sides of the core stage as on the Shuttle. [11] Period illustrations suggest that much larger rockets than NLS-1 were contemplated, using multiples of the NLS-1 core stage. [13] [14]