Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rational Team Concert Code Review: IBM actively developed Proprietary: Rational Team Concert Linux, macOS, Windows pre- and post-commit Review Board: reviewboard.org actively developed MIT: CVS, Subversion, Git (partial), [1] Mercurial, Bazaar, Perforce, ClearCase, Plastic SCM Python: pre- and post-commit Rietveld: Guido van Rossum: actively ...
sider review. Sider is an automated code review tool with GitHub. [1] It's based on static code analysis and integrates with a number of open source static analysis tools. [2] It checks style violations, code quality, security and dependencies and provides results as a comment on GitHub pull request.
SonarQube (formerly Sonar) [3] is an open-source platform developed by SonarSource for continuous inspection of code quality to perform automatic reviews with static analysis of code to detect bugs and code smells on 29 programming languages.
Software developers in a team can review each other's modifications on their source code using a Web browser and approve or reject those changes. It integrates closely with Git, a distributed version control system. Gerrit is a fork of Rietveld, a code review tool for Subversion. Both are named after Dutch designer Gerrit Rietveld. [3] [4]
An open-source tool designed to find faults in the Linux kernel. Splint: 2007-07-12 (3.1.2) Yes; GPLv2 — C — — — — — An open-source tool statically checking C programs for security vulnerabilities and coding mistakes. StyleCop: 2016-05-02 (2016.1.0) Yes; Ms-PL — C# — — .NET — — Analyzes C# source code to enforce a set of ...
Phabricator is [5] a suite of web-based development collaboration tools, which includes a code review tool called Differential, a repository browser called Diffusion, a change monitoring tool called Herald, [6] a bug tracker called Maniphest, and a wiki called Phriction. [7] Phabricator integrates with Git, Mercurial, and Subversion.
Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people examine the source code of a computer program, either after implementation or during the development process. The persons performing the checking, excluding the author, are called "reviewers".
Automated code review software checks source code against a predefined set of rules and produces reports. [2] Different types of browsers visualise software structure and help humans better understand its structure. Such systems are geared more to analysis because they typically do not contain a predefined set of rules to check software against.