Ads
related to: discriminant rules algebra 2 practice problemssidekickbird.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Then the discriminant is the product of the a i, which is well-defined as a class in K/(K ×) 2. Geometrically, the discriminant of a quadratic form in three variables is the equation of a quadratic projective curve. The discriminant is zero if and only if the curve is decomposed in lines (possibly over an algebraically closed extension of the ...
An integral basis is given by {1, α, α(α + 1)/2} and the discriminant of K is −503. [5] [6] Repeated discriminants: the discriminant of a quadratic field uniquely identifies it, but this is not true, in general, for higher-degree number fields. For example, there are two non-isomorphic cubic fields of discriminant 3969.
The following table shows some orders of small discriminant of quadratic fields. The maximal order of an algebraic number field is its ring of integers, and the discriminant of the maximal order is the discriminant of the field. The discriminant of a non-maximal order is the product of the discriminant of the corresponding maximal order by the ...
Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), normal discriminant analysis (NDA), or discriminant function analysis is a generalization of Fisher's linear discriminant, a method used in statistics and other fields, to find a linear combination of features that characterizes or separates two or more classes of objects or events.
For this converse the field discriminant is needed. This is the Dedekind discriminant theorem. In the example above, the discriminant of the number field () with x 3 − x − 1 = 0 is −23, and as we have seen the 23-adic place ramifies. The Dedekind discriminant tells us it is the only ultrametric place that does.
Vieta's formulas can equivalently be written as < < < (=) = for k = 1, 2, ..., n (the indices i k are sorted in increasing order to ensure each product of k roots is used exactly once). The left-hand sides of Vieta's formulas are the elementary symmetric polynomials of the roots.
The proof of the general Leibniz rule [2]: 68–69 proceeds by induction. Let f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} be n {\displaystyle n} -times differentiable functions. The base case when n = 1 {\displaystyle n=1} claims that: ( f g ) ′ = f ′ g + f g ′ , {\displaystyle (fg)'=f'g+fg',} which is the usual product rule and is known ...
The symbolic representation of the discriminant is = where a and b are the symbols. The meaning of the expression (ab) 2 is as follows. First of all, (ab) is a shorthand form for the determinant of a matrix whose rows are a 1, a 2 and b 1, b 2, so
Ads
related to: discriminant rules algebra 2 practice problemssidekickbird.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month