Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is a list of cases before the United States Supreme Court that the Court has agreed to hear and has not yet decided. [1] [2] [3]Future argument dates are in parentheses; arguments in these cases have been scheduled, but have not, and potentially may not, take place.
Four had still been pending in federal jurisdiction at the United States Supreme Court. Of these, two lawsuits were filed after Election Day, and the other two were filed before the election. The lawsuits filed after Election day were Bognet et al. v. Boockvar et al. and Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar et al..
Lawsuits alleging violations of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (the DACA lawsuit) New York v. Trump (another DACA lawsuit) Vidal v. Nielsen (another DACA lawsuit) Lawsuit alleging violations of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Stone v. Trump
The lawsuits – including a defamation case from the Central Park Five, eight lawsuits over Trump’s role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol and two cases related to the clearing ...
The money — which comes from a settlement to a class-action lawsuit that Superior Court Judge Stuart M. Rice has preliminarily approved — is solely for current or former residential customers ...
In United States law, a lis pendens (Latin for 'suit pending' [1]) is a written notice that a lawsuit has been filed concerning real estate, involving either the title to the property or a claimed ownership interest in it. The notice is usually filed in the county land records office.
The strongest argument against any effort by Trump to get his civil cases paused or dismissed may be a 1997 Supreme Court ruling in a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by a former Arkansas state ...
In April 2016, three non-profit organizations—the Alliance for Justice, the National Veterans Legal Services Program and the National Consumer Law Center—filed another class-action lawsuit, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, against the Administrative Office, [21] alleging that the PACER fee structure did not conform ...