Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ohio v. American Express Co., 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the nature of antitrust law in relationship to two-sided markets.The case specifically involves policies set by some credit card banks that prevented merchants from steering customers to use cards from other issuers with lower transaction fees, forcing merchants to pay higher transaction fees to ...
Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning arbitration of private securities fraud claims arising under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. By a 5–4 margin the Court held that its holding in a 1953 case, Wilko v.
The Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) was formed by American Express, Discover Financial Services, JCB International, MasterCard and Visa Inc. on September 7, 2006, [1] with the goal of managing the ongoing evolution of the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard.
Its North American corporate headquarters is based in Costa Mesa, California. Trump says he plans to change Gulf of Mexico's name to "Gulf of America" Justin Trudeau announces he'll resign as ...
Search the web. Legal Main; Terms of Service Summary; Terms of Service; Legal Information Privacy Policy. Privacy Policy Highlights
A subpoena duces tecum (pronounced in English / s ə ˈ p iː n ə ˌ dj uː s iː z ˈ t iː k ə m / sə-PEE-nə DEW-seez TEE-kəm), or subpoena for production of evidence, is a court summons ordering the recipient to appear before the court and produce documents or other tangible evidence for use at a hearing or trial. In some jurisdictions ...
We will take all legal and technical measures to prevent such abuse. Other websites and services have their own policies and standards that may differ from ours. We cannot remove or otherwise take action with respect to the content and conduct you may encounter on those websites. You should review the policies for each website you visit.
In New South Wales, a court may set aside the whole, or part, of a subpoena on the basis that it is a "fishing expedition".In Lowery v Insurance Australia Ltd, the NSW Court of Appeal held that where documents requested in the schedule of a subpoena are deemed to have no relevance to the proceedings in dispute, the subpoena may be set aside as it has no legitimate forensic purpose.