Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Though the channel hosting BFDI has over 2.5 million subscribers and over 1.8 billion views, [10] [a] these numbers do not justify the creation of a BFDI article on Wikipedia. Usually, when something is popular, many reliable sources report on the subject, making it notable.
take Tadc for example, the reason it had large media was because it had topped the charts of youtube and made millions of hits, which is different to bfdi, for example the reason bfdi 1 was so popular (at 60M) was because it was the first video made for bfdi, and many people watched it, not many liked it, it was seen as “childish and immature ...
A2: Wikipedians are not "biased" against BFDI. The creation of a Battle for Dream Island article is simply not allowed because the topic lacks notability and overly enthusiastic fans have repeatedly recreated it despite consensus favoring its deletion.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
bfdi's effect on independent animation is undeniable and it not even getting mentioned in its article because of the lack of reliable sources covering which is a little odd to me as bfdi is mentioned in tomska's article because of a single cameo 207.235.149.135 20:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
It is popular online, but only online, which is why media outlets haven't covered it. It would be like making an Eddsworld page before Edd Gould died, since all of the sources used on the page came from outlets talking about his death. BFDI is only popular on the internet, and no news outlets have covered it due to that.
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
The Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI, German: Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit), referring to either a person or the agency they lead, is tasked with supervising data protection as well as acting in an ombudsman function in freedom of information.