enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Genealogy of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus

    A minority view holds that while Luke gives the genealogy of Joseph, Matthew gives the genealogy of Mary. A few ancient authorities seem to offer this interpretation. [64] Although the Greek text as it stands is plainly against it, it has been proposed that in the original text Matthew had one Joseph as Mary's father and another as her husband.

  3. Two-source hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-source_hypothesis

    The 2SH explains the features of the triple tradition by proposing that both Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source. Mark appears more 'primitive': his diction and grammar are less literary than Matthew and Luke, his language is more prone to redundancy and obscurity, his Christology is less supernatural, and he makes more frequent use of ...

  4. Heli (biblical figure) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heli_(biblical_figure)

    If Matthew's genealogy is that of Mary, and Luke's of Joseph, then there is a problem with the curse on the Solomonic line, dating from the time of Jeconiah where Jeremiah pronounced that no descendant of Jeconiah would again sit on the throne of David in Judah. [9] In contrast, if Luke's genealogy is that of Mary, and Matthew's of Joseph, [10 ...

  5. Genealogies in the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogies_in_the_Bible

    The New Testament provides two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew and another in the Gospel of Luke. [6] [non-primary source needed] Matthew starts with Abraham, while Luke begins with Adam.{Luke 3:23-38} The lists are identical between Abraham and David but differ radically from that point.

  6. Matthean Posteriority hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthean_Posteriority...

    Gottlob Christian Storr, in his 1786 argument for Marcan priority, [1] asked, if Mark was a source for Matthew and Luke, how the latter two were then related. Storr proposed, among other possibilities, that the canonical Matthew (written in Greek) was translated from the original, which was written in either Hebrew or Aramaic (the logia spoken of by Papias) by following Mark primarily but also ...

  7. Four-document hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-document_hypothesis

    The four-document hypothesis or four-source hypothesis is an explanation for the relationship between the three Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.It posits that there were at least four sources to the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke: the Gospel of Mark and three lost sources (Q, M, and L).

  8. Three-source hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-source_hypothesis

    The three-source hypothesis is a candidate solution to the synoptic problem.It combines aspects of the two-source hypothesis and the Farrer hypothesis.It states that the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke used the Gospel of Mark and a sayings collection as primary sources, but that the Gospel of Luke also used the Gospel of Matthew as a subsidiary source.

  9. Historical reliability of the Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    "Gospels" is the standard term for the four New Testament books carrying the names of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, each recounting the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (including his dealings with John the Baptist, his trial and execution, the discovery of his empty tomb, and, at least in three of them, his appearances to his disciples after his death).