enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

3. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

   R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

4. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Human...

   Lord Hoffmann in a case, R (Simms) v Home Secretary, which bridged the introduction of the Human Rights Act, said: [10] Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 will not detract from this power.

5. 6 Best New Costco Clothing Items That Are Worth Every Penny - AOL

   www.aol.com/6-best-costco-clothing-items...

   DKNY Ladies’ Straight Leg Ponte Pant. Price: $18.99 If you went to Macy’s and bought a pair of DKNY women’s straight leg pants, your wallet would be set back $99.. At Costco, a similar style ...

6. List of judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_judgements_of_the...

   Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

7. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The case was first heard by a Divisional Court, composed of Watkins LJ and Mann J. Mann, with Watkins concurring, rejected the Northumbria Police Authority's argument, saying that under the Royal Prerogative HM Government retained the right to do whatever "was necessary to meet either an actual or an apprehended threat to the peace", something that had not previously been recognised as a ...