enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Davis (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis_(2019)

    On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion on January 31, 2017, denying both defendants’ challenges and affirming the district court’s judgment below. [2] The defendants petitioned the US Supreme Court for certiorari, and following the Court’s decision in Sessions v.

  3. File:Davis v. United States (2020).pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Davis_v._United...

    This file is a work of an officer or employee of the Supreme Court of the United States, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the file is in the public domain in the United States.

  4. Davis v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States

    United States Supreme Court cases titled Davis v. United States: Davis v. United States, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), a per curiam opinion; Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule) Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (invocation of the right to counsel under Miranda) Davis v.

  5. Davis v. United States (1973) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1973)

    Davis v. United States, 411 U.S. 233 (1973), was a 1973 United States Supreme Court case concerning criminal procedure and collateral attacks on criminal convictions. The majority opinion, authored by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist, held that when claims of unconstitutional jury discrimination are brought on postconviction collateral review, they are subject to the timeliness ...

  6. Davis v. United States (2011) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(2011)

    Davis v. United States , 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule ". [ 1 ]

  7. Davis v. United States (1994) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1994)

    Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court established that the right to counsel can only be legally asserted by an "unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel." [1] Legal scholars have criticized this case stating that the "bright line" rule established under Edwards v.

  8. Kim Davis hopes her case overturns Supreme Court’s gay ...

    www.aol.com/kim-davis-hopes-her-case-172357446.html

    U.S. District Judge David L. Bunning ordered Davis jailed for contempt of court for refusing to follow his order to issue marriage licenses in compliance with the Supreme Court decision.

  9. United States v. Davis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis

    United States v. Davis may refer to: United States v. Davis, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion on tax treatment of divorce settlements; United States v. Davis, an 11th Circuit ruling on the need for a warrant to obtain cell phone location data; United States v. Davis, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion on the residual clause of the Hobbs Act