Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people examine the source code of a computer program, either after implementation or during the development process. The persons performing the checking, excluding the author, are called "reviewers".
Code reviewing software is computer software that helps humans find flaws in program source code and therefore assure the quality of the source code. [1] It can be divided into two categories: Automated code review software checks source code against a predefined set of rules and produces reports.
Code review is a useful place to centralise reviews from other editors. Code reviews are entirely voluntary, open to any feedback, and nominators may also request feedback for specific issues. Editors and nominators may both edit articles during the discussion.
Code review is systematic examination (often as peer review) of computer source code. Pair programming is a type of code review where two persons develop code together at the same workstation. Inspection is a very formal type of peer review where the reviewers are following a well-defined process to find defects.
The term is usually applied to analysis performed by an automated tool, with human analysis typically being called "program understanding", program comprehension, or code review. In the last of these, software inspection and software walkthroughs are also used.
In software development, peer review is a type of software review in which a work product (document, code, or other) is examined by author's colleagues, in order to evaluate the work product's technical content and quality.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
A code review can be done as a special kind of inspection in which the team examines a sample of code and fixes any defects in it. In a code review, a defect is a block of code which does not properly implement its requirements, which does not function as the programmer intended, or which is not incorrect but could be improved (for example, it ...