Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In United States trademark law, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976) [1] established the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness in the US, breaking trademarks into classes which are accorded differing degrees of protection.
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. L & L Wings, Inc. 962 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1992) Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976) (established the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness in the United States, breaking trademarks into classes which are accorded differing degrees of protection) Aycock Engineering v.
In United States trademark law, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976) established the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness in the US, breaking trademarks into classes which are accorded differing degrees of protection.
In 1978, Oshman's purchased the rights to the trade name of Abercrombie and Fitch from First National Bank of Chicago for $1.5 million [6] ($5.2 million in 2013 dollars). [7] At the time, Abercrombie and Fitch had filed bankruptcy and was a brand that sold lavish items along with fishing and hunting gear. [ 8 ]
Template:Abercrombie & Fitch; Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc. History of Abercrombie & Fitch; E. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie ...
A former Abercrombie & Fitch employee speaks about the narrow image of masculinity the company sold and the toll it took on him and other Asian American men.
A former model for Abercrombie & Fitch on Friday sued the fashion retailer, alleging it allowed its former CEO Mike Jeffries to run a sex-trafficking organization during his 22-year tenure.
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code