enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._National...

    The New Jersey legislature had prepared a bill legalizing sports gambling prior to the Supreme Court ruling, and upon the Court's decision, formally introduced the bill the same day; the bill had undergone several revisions, and had passed both houses and signed into law by Governor Murphy by June 11, 2018. [44] [45]

  3. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2009) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Fox_Television...

    However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in the case Fox et al. v. Federal Communications Commission (06-1760 Archived February 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine) that the FCC cannot punish broadcast stations for such incidents. [6] On the week of March 17, 2008, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear this ...

  4. Super Tuesday preview and Supreme Court's Trump ballot ruling ...

    www.aol.com/news/super-tuesday-preview-supreme...

    Sports. Weather. 24/7 Help. ... Super Tuesday preview and Supreme Court's Trump ballot ruling: Morning Rundown. Elizabeth Robinson. March 5, 2024 at 7:05 AM ... Follow our live blog for the latest.

  5. Supreme Court decision guide: Takeaways from the Trump ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-decision-guide...

    The ruling: In a 6-3 decision, the justices reversed a ruling from a San Francisco-based appeals court that found public sleeping bans were a form of cruel and unusual punishment.

  6. Close polls, likely legal challenges: How TV networks will ...

    www.aol.com/news/close-polls-likely-legal...

    The polls are close, the lawyers are ready and the networks may be in for marathon coverage — or not. What TV news learned from 2020 and how it shaped preparations for 2024.

  7. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Fox_Television...

    Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 567 U.S. 239 (2012), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's scheme for regulating speech is unconstitutionally vague.

  8. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Cos...

    The Court's decision describes Aereo as not being "simply an equipment provider" with an "overwhelming likeness to cable companies" that "performs petitioners' works 'publicly.'" Further, the Court adds that its decision should not discourage the emergence or use of different kinds of technologies. [24] Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito dissented.

  9. Court ruling gives Oregon State and Washington State control ...

    www.aol.com/sports/court-ruling-gives-oregon...

    The Washington Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Oregon State and Washington State in their fight for control of the Pac-12. The court said Friday that it was lifting a stay that it implemented ...