Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Craig, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that closed circuit testimony was permissible where it was limited to circumstances with a likelihood that a minor may be harmed by testifying in open court. [53] The case also influenced how very young children were questioned for evidence in court cases with concerns over their capacity ...
Children were found with bruises on their arms, appearing frail, and caked with dirt. [20] The children were so malnourished that deputies thought they were all under 18 years old, when in fact seven were over 18. [26] The house contained hundreds of journals written by the children about their lives. [27]
Tape v. Hurley, 66 Cal. 473, (1885) was a landmark court case in the California Supreme Court in which the Court found the exclusion of a Chinese American student from public school based on her ancestry unlawful. The case effectively ruled that minority children were entitled to attend public school in California.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Full case name: Latasha Winkfield, an individual parent and guardian of Jahi McMath, a minor vs Children's Hospital Oakland, Dr David Durand M.D. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive : Citation: Docket report [1] Case history; Prior history: Alameda County Case No. RP-13-707598 ...
Drenthe hermits family of six children, Ruinerwold, the Netherlands, at least 9 years, discovered in October 2019. [7] [8] Elisabeth Fritzl and her children, Austria, 24 years, [9] discovered on 26 April 2008. Elizabeth Wesson, her sisters, her children, her nieces and her nephews, Fresno, California, US, 26 years, discovered on 12 March 2004.
Ward v. Flood 48 Cal. 49–52 (1874) was the first school segregation case before the California Supreme Court, which established the principle of "separate but equal" schools in California law, [1] 22 years before the United States Supreme Court decided Plessy v.
The case has also been discussed or mentioned in more than forty separate academic journal articles relating to murder, female victims of domestic violence, and rape. [2] More than 160 court decisions in California have cited, mentioned, or discussed this opinion. [3]
Latina women were seen as "hyper fertile" and their "children are sometimes called anchor babies." [6] Even though the women did not win their case, they were able to cause a significant amount of change for women in the future with the amount of attention Latina women's reproduction rights were receiving. The case led to hospitals making the ...