Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In psychometrics, predictive validity is the extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on some criterion measure. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] For example, the validity of a cognitive test for job performance is the correlation between test scores and, for example, supervisor performance ratings.
The positive predictive value (PPV), or precision, is defined as = + = where a "true positive" is the event that the test makes a positive prediction, and the subject has a positive result under the gold standard, and a "false positive" is the event that the test makes a positive prediction, and the subject has a negative result under the gold standard.
Although concurrent and predictive validity are similar, it is cautioned to keep the terms and findings separated. "Concurrent validity should not be used as a substitute for predictive validity without an appropriate supporting rationale." [3] Criterion validity is typically assessed by comparison with a gold standard test. [4]
Test validity is the extent to which a test (such as a chemical, physical, or scholastic test) accurately measures what it is supposed to measure.In the fields of psychological testing and educational testing, "validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests". [1]
The validity of a measurement tool (for example, a test in education) is the degree to which the tool measures what it claims to measure. [3] Validity is based on the strength of a collection of different types of evidence (e.g. face validity, construct validity, etc.) described in greater detail below.
Two major factors determine the quality of newly hired employees, predictor validity (aka predictive validity) and selection ratio. [1] The predictor cutoff is a test score differentiating those passing a selection measure from those who did not. People above this score are hired or are further considered while those below it are not.
The race-norming in reported GATB individual results did not affect the demographic and statistical validity of the raw, unadjusted GATB scores. In 1990-1991 this practice became more widely known. The public controversy over it resulted in such race-norming of employment testing being explicitly outlawed by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 .
Many psychologists and education researchers saw "predictive, concurrent, and content validities as essentially ad hoc, construct validity was the whole of validity from a scientific point of view" [15] In the 1974 version of The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing the inter-relatedness of the three different aspects of validity ...