Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Freedom For All Massachusetts, also known as "Yes on 3," formed to campaign for the "Yes" vote to preserve the existing anti-discrimination law. The political advocacy coalition included: hundreds of large and small businesses, [8] including Google, Facebook, Twitter, and healthcare organizations including Boston Children's Hospital; [9]
The ballot language of the measure reads as follows: [3] A YES VOTE would enact the proposed law eliminating state criminal and civil penalties related to the medical use of marijuana, allowing patients meeting certain conditions to obtain marijuana produced and distributed by new state-regulated centers or, in specific hardship cases, to grow ...
Massachusetts is looking to lead the way in allowing rideshare drivers to unionize with question 3 on your ballot. A yes vote would give Massachusetts rideshare drivers the option to join a union ...
On October 23, 2018, The Boston Globe editorial board endorsed a 'no' vote on Question 1, saying the nursing staff ratio is wrong for Massachusetts. [8] On October 26, the Boston Herald also advocated for a 'no' vote. [9] Governor of Massachusetts Charlie Baker said he would vote 'no', [10] while Mayor of Boston Marty Walsh said he would vote ...
A YES VOTE would eliminate the requirement that students pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in order to graduate high school but still require students to complete ...
In addition to choosing the nation's next President and Vice President - and several down ballot races - Mass. will vote on five ballot questions. Nov. 5 election: Five ballot questions only ...
An Act to Prevent Cruelty to Farm Animals, more commonly known as Question 3, was the third initiative on the 2016 Massachusetts ballot. [1] The measure requires Massachusetts farmers to give chickens , pigs , and calves enough room to turn around, stand up, lie down, and fully extend their limbs.
Question 3 on the ballot, "Expanding Prohibitions on Gaming". [ 1 ] A YES VOTE would prohibit the Massachusetts Gaming Commission from issuing licenses for casinos and other gambling establishments (primarily those with table games and/or slot machines ); this prohibition would void licenses previously issued.