Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Cannon fodder is an informal, derogatory term for combatants who are regarded or treated by government or military command as expendable in the face of enemy fire. The term is generally used in situations where combatants are forced to fight against hopeless odds (with the foreknowledge that they will suffer extremely high casualties) in an effort to achieve a strategic goal; an example is the ...
Here are Jeff Sharlet's exact words: "They have evidence. Men, particularly poor and working-class men, are cannon fodder abroad and expendable labor at home, trapped beneath a glass floor in jobs nobody really wantsfarm workers, roofers, garbagemenand injured at far higher rates than women."(3) This is an example of how the author writes:
Male expendability, the relative expendability argument, or the expendable male hypothesis, is the idea that the lives of male humans are of less concern to a population than those of female humans because they are less necessary for population replacement.
If separating words using spaces is also permitted, the total number of known possible meanings rises to 58. [38] Czech has the syllabic consonants [r] and [l], which can stand in for vowels. A well-known example of a sentence that does not contain a vowel is Strč prst skrz krk, meaning "stick your finger through the neck."
"Expendable" (short story), a science fiction story by Philip K. Dick; The Expendables (2010 film), an action film by David Callaham and Sylvester Stallone; Millennium Soldier: Expendable, a video game; Expendable launch system, a type of space launch system where the first stage or tank structure of a rocket is used only once.
In "Expend4bles," which revives the series after nearly a decade, the revolving-door casting has now gotten so random that it’s starting to make this feel like the action equivalent of ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The advice in this guideline is not limited to the examples provided and should not be applied rigidly. If a word can be replaced by one with less potential for misunderstanding, it should be. [1] Some words have specific technical meanings in some contexts and are acceptable in those contexts, e.g. claim in law.