enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it – be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license – , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software ...

  3. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

    The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."

  4. License compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility

    License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.

  5. BSD licenses - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses

    The BSD license is a simple license that merely requires that all code retain the BSD license notice if redistributed in source code format, or reproduce the notice if redistributed in binary format. The BSD license (unlike some other licenses e.g. GPL) does not require that source code be distributed at all.

  6. WTFPL - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

    The license was confirmed as a GPL-compatible free software license by the Free Software Foundation, but its use is "not recommended". [1] In 2009, the Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license due to redundancy with the Fair License. [2] The WTFPL version 2 is an accepted Copyfree license. [14]

  7. Free-software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

    A GitHub study in 2015 on their statistical data found that the MIT license was the most prominent FOSS license on that platform. [38] In June 2016 an analysis of the Fedora Project's packages showed as most used licenses the GPL family, followed by MIT, BSD, the LGP family, Artistic (for Perl packages), LPPL (for texlive packages

  8. List of free and open-source software packages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free_and_open...

    This is a list of free and open-source software (FOSS) packages, computer software licensed under free software licenses and open-source licenses.Software that fits the Free Software Definition may be more appropriately called free software; the GNU project in particular objects to their works being referred to as open-source. [1]

  9. ISC license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license

    The ISC license is a permissive free software license published by the Internet Software Consortium, now called Internet Systems Consortium (ISC). It is functionally equivalent to the simplified BSD and MIT licenses, but without language deemed unnecessary following the Berne Convention .