Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The process of putting a product into normal order is called normal ordering (also called Wick ordering). The terms antinormal order and antinormal ordering are analogously defined, where the annihilation operators are placed to the left of the creation operators.
By the well-ordering principle, has a minimum element such that when =, the equation is false, but true for all positive integers less than . The equation is true for n = 1 {\displaystyle n=1} , so c > 1 {\displaystyle c>1} ; c − 1 {\displaystyle c-1} is a positive integer less than c {\displaystyle c} , so the equation holds for c − 1 ...
In mathematics, a well-order (or well-ordering or well-order relation) on a set S is a total ordering on S with the property that every non-empty subset of S has a least element in this ordering. The set S together with the ordering is then called a well-ordered set (or woset). [1]
In second-order logic, however, the well-ordering theorem is strictly stronger than the axiom of choice: from the well-ordering theorem one may deduce the axiom of choice, but from the axiom of choice one cannot deduce the well-ordering theorem. [7] There is a well-known joke about the three statements, and their relative amenability to intuition:
Every well-ordered set (S,<) is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals less than one specific ordinal number under their natural ordering. This canonical set is the order type of ( S ,<). Essentially, an ordinal is intended to be defined as an isomorphism class of well-ordered sets: that is, as an equivalence class for the equivalence relation ...
However, if the relation in question is already well-ordered, one can often use transfinite induction without invoking the axiom of choice. [4] For example, many results about Borel sets are proved by transfinite induction on the ordinal rank of the set; these ranks are already well-ordered, so the axiom of choice is not needed to well-order them.
The most important among them are Zorn's lemma and the well-ordering theorem. In fact, Zermelo initially introduced the axiom of choice in order to formalize his proof of the well-ordering theorem. Set theory. Tarski's theorem about choice: For every infinite set A, there is a bijective map between the sets A and A×A.
An order that is both translation-invariant and a well-order is called a reduction order. From the presentation of the monoid it is possible to define a rewriting system given by the relations R. If A x B is in R then either A < B in which case B → A is a rule in the rewriting system, otherwise A > B and A → B.