enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Soundness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundness

    In logic and deductive reasoning, an argument is sound if it is both valid in form and has no false premises. [1] Soundness has a related meaning in mathematical logic, wherein a formal system of logic is sound if and only if every well-formed formula that can be proven in the system is logically valid with respect to the logical semantics of the system.

  3. Completeness (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completeness_(logic)

    Semantic completeness is the converse of soundness for formal systems. A formal system is complete with respect to tautologousness or "semantically complete" when all its tautologies are theorems, whereas a formal system is "sound" when all theorems are tautologies (that is, they are semantically valid formulas: formulas that are true under every interpretation of the language of the system ...

  4. SLD resolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLD_resolution

    Given a goal clause, represented as the negation of a problem to be solved : with selected literal , and an input definite clause: . whose positive literal (atom) unifies with the atom of the selected literal , SLD resolution derives another goal clause, in which the selected literal is replaced by the negative literals of the input clause and the unifying substitution is applied:

  5. Logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

    Logic programming languages are designed specifically to express facts using logical formulas and to draw inferences from these facts. For example, Prolog is a logic programming language based on predicate logic. [170] Computer scientists also apply concepts from logic to problems in computing. The works of Claude Shannon were influential in ...

  6. Gödel's completeness theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_completeness_theorem

    Since the converse (soundness) also holds, it follows that if and only if, and thus that syntactic and semantic consequence are equivalent for first-order logic. This more general theorem is used implicitly, for example, when a sentence is shown to be provable from the axioms of group theory by considering an arbitrary group and showing that ...

  7. Propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

    It is also called propositional logic, [2] statement logic, [1] sentential calculus, [3] sentential logic, [4] [1] or sometimes zeroth-order logic. [ b ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] Sometimes, it is called first-order propositional logic [ 9 ] to contrast it with System F , but it should not be confused with first-order logic .

  8. Second-order logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-order_logic

    The second-order logic without these restrictions is sometimes called full second-order logic to distinguish it from the monadic version. Monadic second-order logic is particularly used in the context of Courcelle's theorem, an algorithmic meta-theorem in graph theory. The MSO theory of the complete infinite binary tree is decidable.

  9. Hoare logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoare_logic

    Hoare logic (also known as Floyd–Hoare logic or Hoare rules) is a formal system with a set of logical rules for reasoning rigorously about the correctness of computer programs. It was proposed in 1969 by the British computer scientist and logician Tony Hoare , and subsequently refined by Hoare and other researchers. [ 1 ]