enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Sexual harassment in the workplace in the United States

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment_in_the...

   Sexual harassment in the workplace in US labor law has been considered a form of discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States since the mid-1970s. [1] [2] There are two forms of sexual harassment recognized by United States law: quid pro quo sexual harassment (requiring an employee to tolerate sexual harassment to keep their job, receive a tangible benefit, or avoid punishment) and ...

3. Sexual harassment - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment

   Studies show that organizational climate (an organization's tolerance, policy, procedure etc.) and workplace environment are essential for understanding the conditions in which sexual harassment is likely to occur, and the way its victims will be affected (yet, research on specific policy and procedure, and awareness strategies is lacking). [135]

4. Workplace harassment - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_harassment

   A common misconception about workplace harassment is that workplace harassment is simply sexual harassment in the context of a workplace. [10] While sexual harassment is a form of workplace harassment, the United States Department of Labor defines workplace harassment as being more than just sexual harassment. [10] "It may entail quid pro quo ...

5. Inhuman Resources - The Huffington Post

   highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/hsbc...

   The case was about retaliation, not sexual harassment, so Hubbard had to prove there was a causal relationship between Mike’s whistleblowing and HSBC’s actions against him. While several of the most sordid details were revealed—Eileen offering Jill to clients and executives, the breast-flashing incident—they were not the focus of the trial.

6. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritor_Savings_Bank_v._Vinson

   Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), is a US labor law case, where the United States Supreme Court, in a 9–0 decision, recognized sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was the first of its kind to reach the Supreme Court and would redefine sexual harassment in the workplace. [1] [2]

7. Your Questions About Workplace Sexual Harassment Answered - AOL

   www.aol.com/news/questions-workplace-sexual...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us